Kates Playgrouns Strawberry

The strange uniformity of the lunar craters

this photo of the moon, I have started to wander a bit, the first thing I thought is:

1. The moon always has a dark side, that is, always shows us the face, and in the same way, so that there is a point that is closest to Earth, and it seems always the same. Must be highly prized because it is the best place to put a transmitter / receiver to communicate with Earth.

2. In view of the craters, the moon does not seem a very safe place to put anything, because having no atmosphere or magnetic field to protect it (the latter course in the middle I digress, I have no idea if any), is continually peppered by meteorites.

3. And now comes the strange. If you always give the same face to the earth, that face, mainly the area closest to the earth, should be well protected against meteorites, the Earth itself.

4. Maybe the earth's gravitational field to deflect certain meteorites that part precisely, but these meteorites are much less than if it were the earth.

Noting the photo, I do not see anything like that, can anyone explain why?

Brent Corrigan Online File

Spanish companies

In this globalized economy, in line with the controversy of the famous "Why do not you shut up?" The Venezuelan president's main threat in the crisis means that going to look very closely to English companies.
But what are the English companies?, And most importantly, What are the benefits for Spain? Is the government protect the interests of English companies?
All these questions have been crowded into my head suddenly. English companies which are primarily concerned Chavez Repsol, Telefonica, Iberia, etc. They putean me here in Spain. I raise the gasoline every time oil goes up and made to lower the slackers, the ones who get to keep the ADSL among the most expensive in Europe, which monopolize the slots at airports, and their exorbitant prices and abuse in airports, treat me like crap rather than as a customer. These are the English companies.
But why are English? Because your capital is in the hands of English? Why employees are in Spain?
Repsol Repsol-YPF is called, because he bought YPF, a multinational South America, and now assumes that the government of my country must defend its interests there. Ie, making YPF, now is my business. Telefonica has bought hundreds of telcos in South America at the expense of my ADSL, and now my government has to defend their interests. Iberia has done the same with the privatization of airlines in South America, and my government is supposed to defend their interests.
top, across South America are pissed off with my country because they say that these companies behave badly there. I know I behave here bad, I never knew there too, but I suffer over their grievances.
Yesterday I read that Air France and KLM are about to buy Iberia. So it is no longer English?, We should withdraw our support, of course. In addition we should complain to the French government will begin to defend their interests or not?

Women With Big Viginias

Science Research and copy images from the Wikipedia

In the October issue of Scientific American, in an article for the regular section of "Mathematical Games", the famous mathematician signing Juan MR Parrondo. Called my attention to a photo published extracted from the English Wikipedia, in the foot puts.
This photo, as most graduates in the Wikipedia is GFDL. In this license, which is similar to the GPL requires that if you are using the image work, such work must also be licensed under the GFDL.
That's the theory and then there is the practice of law enforcement in terms of the licenses. I wonder what should happen at this point.
1. Parrondo article automatically becomes GFDL although he does not want to have used the license, so if I am going to shoot it here below and we will change some expressions that do not like, even put another photo.
2. The journal should be seized from newsstands to be infringing the license.
3. Parrondo Simply post your item is GFDL, regardless of copyright text that appears in the magazine.
4. All journal becomes GFDL.
5. The magazine must pay compensation to the wikipedia for fraudulent use of the image.
6. I really use is correct because the statement is sufficient, and the item can not be considered fraudulent use.
7. The magazine must pay compensation to the true author.
8. The magazine must pay compensation to the true author, if you know who he is, but only a nick in Wikipedia, so that someone would have first claim authorship by judicial means.
....

I can think of many more possibilities, but I have no means clear which is good, I guess it takes a little jurisprudence on the subject, or there is and I do not know.
Perhaps these questions have to do to me in five years, where this is already outdated.