May 2009

Thursday, May 7, 2009

What Happened To Courtney Day

courses for unemployed workers' commitment to your business

ago

not so normal is that most workers spend their entire working lives in the same company, they knew their commitment to the company was reciprocated by the commitment of the company themselves. Firing someone was the last resort and only done in times of extreme gravity to the company.

That all changed in the interest of "necessary flexibility" of the labor market. The dismissal has become more variable with which to maneuver in order to adjust the balances at year end (unfortunately, the strategy also has been abandoned in the same period, but that is another matter.)

Popular culture is always a lag of several years regarding the economic situation, and at first, all who enter the labor market did so with the same commitment and dedication as they did earlier, they had a better contract than his.

From there, the virtual completion of contract, or the first dismissal. The worker is to be committed to the street, after the commitment he had with the company itself, and that the company apparently did not have with him. Moreover, he goes with his partner vague, that was sneaking out during this time, and get the same reward.

In his next job, the worker is to fly behind the ear, but remains committed to its business, is doing overtime without pay, and without question, and reiterates the same thing happened. His colleague the vague and did not a have the same curriculum.

A third company suffers commitment, attitude as well. In the fifth fly because your partner is now he who is shirking its utmost, and I have driven both.

popular culture assimilating the new system will work, and increasingly need fewer redundancies, or bankruptcy, or end of contracts to achieve the same. ... Until they completely assimilated.

Currently, those entering the labor market, and know the score beforehand, know what to expect and act almost all without compromise and without attitude.

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

How To Get Secret Agents Outfit On Poptropica

labor contracts

In these times of crisis, the only approach entrepreneurs have crisis is to create contracts with more favorable conditions for them.

The problem of employment contracts in Spain is just the opposite, taking 20 years we have been increasingly garbage contracts.

labor costs have been reduced in terms of these contracts, and also the involvement of workers.

Large companies outsource their processes with consulting companies created by them specifically for them. Companies with high turnover and no structure consolidates.

Thanks to all these 'relaxations' labor market, our companies are competing with each other using the cut labor costs rather than innovation. The benefit of an ERE workers with more seniority is greater investment in R & D. And all this has been encouraged at the time of expansion of the bubble.

now return to the mantra that the problem is the contracts and it is true. The production structure in this country is rotten, because nobody has long-term strategies. The immediacy of the results presented in the balance the reduction of working conditions of staff gives huge profits to managers. Lords

entrepreneurs, you live in an open economy that competes with countries like France or Germany with wage costs are much higher and complaining about the tight labor market.

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Life Expectancy With Wegener's Disease

crisis Pantomime lack of liquidity and credit

past few months have been talking about the lack of liquidity as if it were the source of misfortunes. After the failure credit as a driver of business disaster.

is very common to confuse the consequences with causes because they occur simultaneously. The other day an acquaintance told me how fucked up it was Spain because it had lowered its debt rating. At no point was raised that what had happened was that he had lowered its debt rating because he has screwed.

This game changing consequences for the reasons given much play. Now We are toying with the lack of credit as if the cause of the bankruptcies. I've heard theories about how the crisis of 29 was generated by the lack of credit, and to me the thought.

now experiencing a crisis of fat in real time, with the invaluable help of the blessed www, I realize how twisted the concepts to find the culprit that no blame.

the outbreak of the financial and real estate bubble, what occurs is an increased risk, but rather a proliferation risk, better risk rises exponentially. During the growth of the bubbles, the risk is almost gone, growth itself carries with it a wave of benefits, saving money and circulating credit makes pr acetic anyone or anything is insolvent. Demand grows and grows.

The match is on and everybody passes it happily. Everyone used to illuminate your business, until it's time for change in trend. As on all who spent the match started to realize almost the same time, that the match is on the finger and to be burned. Then there was the risk that anywhere, appears everywhere, because everything falls apart. Appearing

risk, credit contract, but no contract can not, indeed should not no contract.

The guy who was a builder begins to have a very high risk of default since. The brick company too, but he does not realize at the time. The employee of clay too, but not realize it, and the employee car factory, and the computer company.

all start to have a very high risk, but they are going to the bank for a mortgage. And are surprised that it is not granted.

Companies should always be a lot of money to each other, but yet no one realizes that the money is gone. The chain is broken and they will not charge, but do not see it and still think your problem is not having a credit for a temporary situation, when what we have above is an irreversible ... to hit bottom.

The lack of liquidity and credit are consequences, not causes. The fact that these consequences will catalyze the process of decomposition, is what leads to confusion with feedback. They are not fed back the process, but only accelerators. The fact that world governments are supposedly acting to inhibit the harmful effects of the catalysts is never going to stop the process, only slow it down.

If, moreover, in their attempt to stop the process, just slow down, what they do is create more debt and more risk, what they are doing is digging a deeper grave to which we are going down slowly.